Community news

Speleology in Kazakhstan

Shakalov on 04 Jul, 2018
Hello everyone!   I pleased to invite you to the official site of Central Asian Karstic-Speleological commission ("Kaspeko")   There, we regularly publish reports about our expeditions, articles and reports on speleotopics, lecture course for instructors, photos etc. ...

New publications on hypogene speleogenesis

Klimchouk on 26 Mar, 2012
Dear Colleagues, This is to draw your attention to several recent publications added to KarstBase, relevant to hypogenic karst/speleogenesis: Corrosion of limestone tablets in sulfidic ground-water: measurements and speleogenetic implications Galdenzi,

The deepest terrestrial animal

Klimchouk on 23 Feb, 2012
A recent publication of Spanish researchers describes the biology of Krubera Cave, including the deepest terrestrial animal ever found: Jordana, Rafael; Baquero, Enrique; Reboleira, Sofía and Sendra, Alberto. ...

Caves - landscapes without light

akop on 05 Feb, 2012
Exhibition dedicated to caves is taking place in the Vienna Natural History Museum   The exhibition at the Natural History Museum presents the surprising variety of caves and cave formations such as stalactites and various crystals. ...

Did you know?

That spring, underflow is a spring that is part of a distributary but which is at lower elevation and preferentially drains base flow. between it and an overflow spring there may be several underflow-overflow springs.?

Checkout all 2699 terms in the KarstBase Glossary of Karst and Cave Terms

What is Karstbase?



Browse Speleogenesis Issues:

KarstBase a bibliography database in karst and cave science.

Featured articles from Cave & Karst Science Journals
Chemistry and Karst, White, William B.
See all featured articles
Featured articles from other Geoscience Journals
Karst environment, Culver D.C.
Mushroom Speleothems: Stromatolites That Formed in the Absence of Phototrophs, Bontognali, Tomaso R.R.; D’Angeli Ilenia M.; Tisato, Nicola; Vasconcelos, Crisogono; Bernasconi, Stefano M.; Gonzales, Esteban R. G.; De Waele, Jo
Calculating flux to predict future cave radon concentrations, Rowberry, Matt; Marti, Xavi; Frontera, Carlos; Van De Wiel, Marco; Briestensky, Milos
Microbial mediation of complex subterranean mineral structures, Tirato, Nicola; Torriano, Stefano F.F;, Monteux, Sylvain; Sauro, Francesco; De Waele, Jo; Lavagna, Maria Luisa; D’Angeli, Ilenia Maria; Chailloux, Daniel; Renda, Michel; Eglinton, Timothy I.; Bontognali, Tomaso Renzo Rezio
Evidence of a plate-wide tectonic pressure pulse provided by extensometric monitoring in the Balkan Mountains (Bulgaria), Briestensky, Milos; Rowberry, Matt; Stemberk, Josef; Stefanov, Petar; Vozar, Jozef; Sebela, Stanka; Petro, Lubomir; Bella, Pavel; Gaal, Ludovit; Ormukov, Cholponbek;
See all featured articles from other geoscience journals

Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 2009, Vol 71, Issue 3, p. 159-167
The evolution of Appalachian fluviokarst: competition between stream erosion, cave development, surface denudation, and tectonic uplift
The long and complex depositional and tectonic history of the Appalachians has produced a substrate of folded and faulted sandstones, shales, and carbonate rocks (leaving aside the metamorphic and igneous core). The Appalachian fluviokarst is an evolving landscape developed on the carbonate rocks. The erosion of surface streams competes with dissolutional processes in the carbonate rocks, and both compete with tectonic uplift of the eastern margin of the North American plate. The Appalachians have undergone erosion since the Jurassic and 5 to 15 kmof sediment have been removed.Many karst landscapes have come and gone during this time period. The earliest cosmogenic- isotope dates place the oldest Appalachian caves in the early Pliocene. Various interpretations and back-calculations extend the recognizable topography to the mid to lateMiocene.Much of the present-day karst landscape was created during the Pleistocene. There have been many measurements and estimates of the rate of denudation of karst surfaces by dissolution of the carbonate bedrock and many estimates of the rate of downcutting of surface streams. Curiously, both of these estimates give similar values (in the range of 30 mm ka21 ), in spite of the differences in the erosional processes. These rates are somewhat higher than present-day rates of tectonic uplift, leaving the contemporary landscape the result of a balance between competing processes. Introduction of tectonic forces into the interpretation of karst landscapes requires consideration of the long-term uplift rates. In the Davisian point of view, uplift was episodic, with short periods of rapid uplift followed by long static periods that allowed the development of peneplains. In the Hackian point of view, uplift has occurred at a more or less constant rate, so that present topography ismainly the result of differential erosion rates. Attempts to back-calculate the development of karst landscapes requires a conceptual model somewhere between these rather extreme points of view.